|

MANILA, Philippines - The principal author of the Reproductive Health (RH) bill urged those opposed to the measure to first support it so that they could challenge its constitutionality.
“If the bishops and their lay allies are determined to challenge the constitutionality of the controversial measure, then they should stop hindering the bill from becoming a statute,” Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman said.
“There can be no judicial scrutiny by the Supreme Court of the constitutionality of the RH bill until it is enacted into law,” he said.
Lagman was reacting to the statement of some Church leaders that they would question the constitutionality of the proposed law on reproductive health, responsible parenthood and population development if Congress approves it and President Aquino signs it.
They claim the measure would promote abortion, which is against the Constitution.
Lagman said he and other authors of the measure are confident that it would pass a test on its constitutionality.
“The RH bill is against abortion as it provides that abortion is illegal and punishable, and is not an endorsed method of family planning. The function of contraceptives is to avoid pregnancy, either by preventing a woman from ovulating or the sperm from reaching the egg, which in either case there is no fertilization and no fetus to abort,” he said.
Lagman said neither the Constitution nor any law prohibits the manufacture, distribution and use of contraceptives.
“The RH bill respects the rights of spouses to found a family in accordance with their religious convictions and the demands of responsible parenthood,” he stressed.
Last Aug. 6, the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to terminate debates on the controversial measure.
However, since then, opponents of the bill have successfully delayed resumption of its consideration by making privilege speeches and questioning the quorum.
The two sides have been blaming each other for the failure of the House to proceed to the next stage of the process, which is the period of introducing amendments or changes in the bill.
Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. has promised to meet with the two sides and come up with rules that could get the measure moving again.
